WHAT WE’RE FIGHTING FOR
Protecting our land for future generations by rezoning the lots to public reserve.
WHAT WE’RE FIGHTING FOR
Protecting our land for future generations by rezoning the lots to public reserve.
WHAT WE’RE FIGHTING FOR
Protecting our land for future generations by rezoning the lots to public reserve.
THE LAND
A natural coastal headland with untouched coastal vegetation.
The land.
Why the proposal doesnt work.
What we stand for.
Gnarabup is the only protected swimming beach on Margaret River’s coastline, famous for its big swells and often dangerous swimming conditions.
The Gnarabup Beach area is a vital community asset that is precious to locals and visitors from throughout Western Australia, Australia and the world and local tourism business operators.
Gnarabup is the main public swimming beach for Margaret River. Many generations of local people have learnt to swim in its protected bay. As the only protected bay on the coastal strip between Gracetown and Hamelin Bay, Gnarabup is the only safe beach for children, is home to numerous swim clubs, Royal Lifesaving WA swimming lessons, and WA Surf lifesaving training. The Gnarabup beach area is so heavily used, that on any sunny day, and many cloudy ones, beachgoers struggle to find a parking spot at either of the two carparks.
Despite common opinion that Margaret River is a wealthy community, in fact, the permanent community has a particularly low average household income. Public assets like the protected Gnarabup Beach that are free to use are incredibly important to this community.
“The proposal of the 120-room resort is only the beginning. Many people don’t realise that the Developer is planning to build a very dense residential and tourism villa development on the lots adjacent to the resort site. The resort is just the start.”
WHY THE PROPOSAL
DOESN’T WORK
Preserve Gnarabup holds major concerns that the development will impact the character of the locality. There are also concerns for impacts on local fauna and flora, the fragile limestone cliffs in the area, karst limestone geology with potential for voids and caves, cliff erosion from rising sea levels as well the loss of an Aboriginal place that has been identified by Traditional Owners and registered with the Department of Planning, Lands and Heritage for assessment as a registered site. We are also very concerned that adding 1,000 plus additional people to the area will make escaping a bushfire on the one road in and out of Gnarabup extremely dangerous. Further, sending the sewerage and other waste from 1,000 plus more people to the failing Gnarabup waste water treatment plant is extremely concerning.
Preserve Gnarabup proposes the local infrastructure of Gnarabup is under-equipped to house this extensive and intensive hotel, permanent residential and tourism villa development.
Rising sea levels are already impacting the beach at Gnarabup and Back Beach to the south. Every year, the decking outside the small café at the Gnarabup has to be repaired or replaced after high swells wash its footings loose much like the carpark that has been washed away at Port Beach in North Fremantle over recent winters. The beach has become narrower and steeper in recent years.
The Shire of Augusta Margaret River’s detailed 2015 modelling of the impact of rising sea levels on this strip of coast, the Coastal Hazard Risk Management and Adaptation Plan, shows that Gnarabup Beach, the headland, Back Beach, the limestone cliffs and parts of the lots proposed for development fall within the 100 year allowance for coastal processes zone. Gnarabup and Back Beach and all public access areas fall within the 10 and 20-year allowance zones. Should this development go ahead it will create a further barrier to the coast and public access to these beaches will be impacted within decades.
WHAT WE STAND FOR
The basis of our stance is:
Hundreds of people turning out to rally for the protection of Gnarabup.
18th July 2020.
Photos Kelly Harwood.
We understand that the Labor Western Australian State Government was elected on a platform of extending the value of the tourism industry in WA. Given this, we understand that the promise of a $70million five-star resort would be very attractive to the Government.
However, we believe the hotel is just a promised attraction that may never eventuate.
The Developer’s main interest is the potential financial returns if he can overcome decades of planning advice through gaining approval for a significant number of permanent residential housing sites on the lots. Expected financial returns from residential property development are much higher than for hotels, with faster return on investment. Further empty luxury residential development on this fragile coast is something the area doesn’t need. Our area needs low cost and affordable housing for the people who work in the local tourism industry which is award winning and well-known throughout the world.
The Premier’s 10 June 2020 press release pointed to the jobs the project would create, which we note are relatively small and short lived. Many thousands of local people and visitors are of the view that the site is worth far more as an undeveloped headland. In its current wild state it is a tourist attraction, indigenous cultural site, highly used community asset and fragile relatively untouched environmental system threatened by rising sea levels and climate change.
Another five-star tourism development is currently being planned just a couple of kilometres away at the site of the historic Wallcliffe house, which tragically burnt down in the 2011 fire. There are also numerous other more suitable sites for tourism development in the area.
The recent passage of new planning legislation gives Western Australian Planning Commission and the Minister of Planning unprecedented power to expedite approval processes for developments. We ask the Cook Government to consider the long and enduring importance of this land to so many normal Western Australians when it considers this inappropriate development.
We understand that the Labor Western Australian State Government was elected on a platform of extending the value of the tourism industry in WA. Given this, we understand that the promise of a $70million five-star resort would be very attractive to the Government.
However, we believe the hotel is just a promised attraction that may never eventuate.
The Developer’s main interest is the potential financial returns if he can overcome decades of planning advice through gaining approval for a significant number of permanent residential housing sites on the lots. Expected financial returns from residential property development are much higher than for hotels, with faster return on investment. Further empty luxury residential development on this fragile coast is something the area doesn’t need. Our area needs low cost and affordable housing for the people who work in the local tourism industry which is award winning and well-known throughout the world.
The Premier’s 10 June 2020 press release pointed to the jobs the project would create, which we note are relatively small and short lived. Many thousands of local people and visitors are of the view that the site is worth far more as an undeveloped headland. In its current wild state it is a tourist attraction, indigenous cultural site, highly used community asset and fragile relatively untouched environmental system threatened by rising sea levels and climate change.
We also note that another five-star tourism development is currently being planned just a couple of kilometres away at the site of the historic Wallcliffe house, which tragically burnt down in the 2011 fire. There are also numerous other more suitable sites for tourism development in the area.
We understand that the recent passage of new planning legislation gives Western Australian Planning Commission and the Minister of Planning unprecedented power to expedite approval processes for developments. We ask the Cook Government to consider the long and enduring importance of this land to so many normal Western Australians when it considers this inappropriate development.
